Reality the Great Illusion
"Redefining the Dream"
Sonia Barrett-Moving Beyond the Frequency of Doubt-Excerpt from Part1-#1 Add Video
This three part interactive workshop was designed to assist one in moving through the daily rituals and challenges faced as one struggles to pierce the veil to higher dimensions of truth. A very grounding principle to keep in focus is that all things from thought to the material world are all frequency patterns. From this principle the holographic nature of our perceived reality is manifested. Many experience great difficulty in maneuvering through the interference ran by the prerecorded programs in our consciousness.
|
| 3672 Views |
Post a Comment
- Oops, you forgot something.
4 Comments
Reply
patrick h johnson
07:29 PM on August 18, 2010
First and foremost I think Sonia is a brillant being and a beautiful mind. When I first meet her, it was like meeting a person from my future coming back to tell me about my present . My life changed and continues to do so because of what I choose to do with the information she shared with me. I LOVE YOU .
Reply
Mary
06:25 PM on June 04, 2010
You need to read more, and not this tripe.
DEFINITION OF STRAWMAN:
2. Strawman: Person B disregards certain key points of X and instead presents the superficially-similar position Y. Thus, Y is a resulting distorted version of X and can be set up in several ways, including:
Presenting a misrepresentation of the opponent's position and then refuting it, thus giving the appearance that the opponent's actual position has been refuted.
2.Quoting an opponent's words out of context ? i.e. choosing quotations that misrepresent the opponent's actual intentions (see contextomy and quote mining).[2]
Presenting someone who defends a position poorly as the defender, then refuting that person's arguments ? thus giving the appearance that every upholder of that position (and thus the position itself) has been defeated.[1]
Inventing a fictitious persona with actions or beliefs which are then criticized, implying that the person represents a group of whom the speaker is critical.
Oversimplifying an opponent's argument, then attacking this oversimplified version.
Person B attacks position Y, concluding that X is false/incorrect/flawed.
This sort of "reasoning" is fallacious, because attacking a distorted version of a position fails to constitute an attack on the actual position.
This pretty much describes the hatred and bigotry out there.
DEFINITION OF STRAWMAN:
2. Strawman: Person B disregards certain key points of X and instead presents the superficially-similar position Y. Thus, Y is a resulting distorted version of X and can be set up in several ways, including:
Presenting a misrepresentation of the opponent's position and then refuting it, thus giving the appearance that the opponent's actual position has been refuted.
2.Quoting an opponent's words out of context ? i.e. choosing quotations that misrepresent the opponent's actual intentions (see contextomy and quote mining).[2]
Presenting someone who defends a position poorly as the defender, then refuting that person's arguments ? thus giving the appearance that every upholder of that position (and thus the position itself) has been defeated.[1]
Inventing a fictitious persona with actions or beliefs which are then criticized, implying that the person represents a group of whom the speaker is critical.
Oversimplifying an opponent's argument, then attacking this oversimplified version.
Person B attacks position Y, concluding that X is false/incorrect/flawed.
This sort of "reasoning" is fallacious, because attacking a distorted version of a position fails to constitute an attack on the actual position.
This pretty much describes the hatred and bigotry out there.
Video Channels
Recent Videos
27 views - 1 comments
17 views - 0 comments
3664 views - 4 comments
1787 views - 3 comments
